No insurmountable walls
On 20 October in Montreal will take place an event of great importance for the sovereignty movement . The RIQ (Rally for the Independence of Quebec) invites all separatists in a meeting on the future country project and how to get there.
"At this happening independence, nothing will be excluded, especially not the creation of a separatist party and fundamentally democratic. A party that is neither right nor left, neither the center nor the Social Democrats. "
Many activists do not believe simply more to the ability of the Parti Quebecois to readjust its strategy in the next Congress. For even if Congress were to give birth to a clear, coherent and focused on sovereignty, there is no requirement to respect the leader, otherwise the low threat of desertions in its marginal customer gained.
other words, nothing like the considerations of a head in front of an organized group, with representatives, whose membership depends on its attitude.
Think about it. The Union of Progressive Forces and Option citizens joined a new party political sovereignty, Quebec-solidarity. This young band creates a great concern for the fracture that it causes in our ranks, but it comes at the same time break the monopoly that supplies the dynamics inside the PQ. Two
sovereignist parties, rather softies, share the stage and now they will not come together soon. It This is a considerable opportunity for independence disappointed realign nationalist politics through their bargaining power. Playing the parties against each other they can expect a competition between the two parties to monopolize the militant force.
This is a great alternative to the creation of a new party known to split the nationalist vote even more, to negotiate their accession. The assembly of RIQ offers an extraordinary opportunity to establish an association of activists who fear that dissatisfied the PQ sink deeper into the wait, to discuss between them, the action plan they wish to see adopted by a party dedicated to national emancipation and decide how to bargain their support for a party. Which shows the candidate most committed to independence and the program more consistent? Which adopts a tone more firm when the national question? What are the issues for change with the parties? Better organized, become disgruntled activists to court rather than to muzzle purzédurs.
One could argue that QoS is not a serious choice because of the tiny space it occupies on the political spectrum. Although not the first choice, before a PQ that show an uncompromising, not worth it not worthwhile to study the hypothesis QS to join before starting another party? Reset to zero for only three parties separatists clash at the provincial level remains a fateful decision that must be evaluated. Moreover, the low political weight of QS should allow some openness to the claims of a group sovereignty, in theory at least. It may, indeed, find the necessary support to carry it lacks a remarkable breakthrough.
Only obstacles overcome
can primarily be divided into three communities activists who no longer recognize themselves in the PQ. One opts for the application of acts of sovereignty upon the election of a sovereign government. The second also wants significant gestures from the beginning of a mandate, and the drafting of a constitution of countries later submitted to the people by referendum (the strategic framework to replace Robert Laplante referendum classic). The last referendum instead wants an election where the election of a separatist government simply to declare Quebec a sovereign country.
Despite their differences, they find themselves united in their desire for a PQ that do not be tempted by the provincial management pending the winning conditions, the moral assurance of winning the next or the next buzzword.
The first task of grouping would be to establish contacts with key organizations that represent these separatist tendencies in order to meet this coalition or to obtain their support.
MES (Movement for an election on sovereignty), the National Action, the SSJB (Societe Saint-Jean Baptiste) and editions of Quebecers could, for example, interested in a coalition designed specifically to increase their influence within the main political party sovereignty and to avoid splitting the latter giving him one last chance to prove to all those who advocate creating a new party that still has the will necessary to achieve our project.
The union of different associations accomplish the necessary basis for a membership drive to reach the maximum membership and assess the real political weight. It will last if it is true that "purzédurs" form only a negligible force as many would have us believe.
Then, all members should know and follow the motto: No funding or renewal of membership card while negotiations continue. All parties need money. So a proposal could include a section where members of the coalition to block their purchase card after an agreement.
All these elements in place, members will elect representatives to join the PQ and QS to negotiate on a clear mandate democratically decided.
Finally, after process, it remains to reunite to settle. Choose one of the offers, or that the PQ is that of QS, or agree that they are insufficient and then found a party.
Mathieu
