My Throat Gets Sore In The Evening

My reasons, my country's future


Considering the expedition of Jacques Cartier in 1534 as the birth of a French nation in North America

Considering that Quebec (New France) is a land conquered by force of arms in 1760 and suffers the British military occupation until 1763, when France ceded Canada to the Britain

Considering that Quebec is annexed by force with the Act of Union in 1840 following the crackdown in the blood of rebellion Parliamentarians Patriots who were refused the government accountable

Recital Confederation in 1867 as a result of the Act of Union

Considering the refusal of the Quebec people to disappear despite the enormous political uncertainty persists since 1760

Considering that Quebec has never agreed to ratify the Constitution Pierre Elliot Troudeau, the country's fundamental law of Canada, since its imposition in 1982

Considering that in Canada, based on the "legitimacy" and their interpretation of this Constitution, the opinion of some judges of the Supreme Court trumps the democratic will of the National Assembly as in the If Jacques Chaoulli case or regression of language laws in Quebec

Considering essential for Quebecers to get rid of this power relationship between the Constitution and its judges appointed by the Prime Minister of Canada, and the intentions of the Quebec nation expressed in the National Assembly through its members elected

Considering the urgent need to dispose of outdated institutions such as the senate and the monarchy

Considering the negative fact that Quebec is not master in all areas and that many important decisions and high level strategic communications, transportation, defense, international relations, immigration and citizenship, he escapes and is taken over him by the Government of Canada

Considering that national independence will allow Quebec to be represented in all major international forums and signing himself arrangements that suit them without going through Canadian

Whereas if Quebecers had a foreign policy of their own, it would be, in several respects, different from that of Canada

Considering that local repatriation all the powers and taxation fields in Quebec City will open the door to greater coherence of action, loss of heaviness of the system and decentralization to the regions, all three impossible in a system where both levels of national governments have conflicting interests

This individual takes a stand for independence Quebec, my only true country

Mathieu

Can Creatine Cause Cottonmouth

Pauline Marois assumes leadership of the Parti Quebecois, a party whose members broke even disagree on the strategy to regain power and to the country of Quebec. It will restore confidence disappeared when many members are considering natural form or join a new party sovereignty, no longer believing in the ability of PQ to achieve its primary objective. To have already challenged the referendum timetable does not reassure. Yet it would be a mistake not to recognize here the flair of a good politician but also the opportunity presents itself. The schedule

separated clans and prevented any meaningful discussion and carrier for the future. The last congress was given birth to this compromise amid polls favorable to 50% by full commission Gomery. And so, all the political front was established in an atmosphere of complacency because of this cyclical aberration. Purists and electioneering could negotiate a compromise solution which had the merit of reducing tensions, temporarily. In the longer term, however, when they returned to the polls normal, that is to say, the slow decline of the PQ, the means to achieve independence proved an obstacle to the election of a sovereign government. The schedule referendum became an object of conflict and resentment in the movement between the different political families. Between electioneering, well aware that we must take power to set in motion the process of separation, and purists, well aware that it is useless to have the power to manage the province of Quebec.

The real danger for the PQ currently embodied in much the temptation of this management Provincial waiting for the next in the abandonment of the schedule. If the mandate was to bring Marois PQ in this direction, the final collapse would inevitably follow.

Many are dissatisfied with the PQ look and do not find or more. In general, they can be divided into three groups. The first advocates the application of acts of sovereignty from the election of a PQ government. The second also wants significant gestures from the beginning of the mandate, and the drafting of a constitution of countries later submitted to the people by referendum (the strategic framework developed by Robert Laplante). The latter opted instead for the referendum election where the election of the PQ is enough to declare Quebec a sovereign country.

Despite their differences, they find themselves united in their desire for a PQ does not sink into the wait.

you can easily guess the result, I suggest these actors coalesce around a kind of "union" that would counterbalance this wait, in addition to channel the energy of activists disappointed in the reform rather than the PQ its destruction. It would be a collective defeat the strategy of good government, a coalition of individuals and associations against the possible drift of winning conditions. The priority of this association is to make proposals that can rally the various trends "purzédurs" to convey to the leadership of the PQ.

Together, we have a better understanding of obstacles to overcome and the game plan to apply and a greater political weight.

Many see it as a radical project. But remember that it can avoid the creation of a new separatist party and convince those who have already dropped out of PQ, or are about, to invest a little time in a beautiful kind of risk, given one last chance to show that the PQ can still achieve sovereignty. This is one more option before leaving the PQ, found a third party and completely undermine the cohesion of the movement for emancipation of Quebecers.

Moreover, an organization that would relay the claims of the purists would solve an old problem of the PQ and allow a climate generally more courteous. Why? The purzédurs consist of several groups and countless individuals, not all members of the PQ, consequently turn to them is not an easy task. That is why the management and they talk through the media, the opposite of effective communication because it involves an actor-witness, the ordinary citizen. This greatly hampers the debate of ideas in the pollutant of unnecessary resentment. The direction and the activists should be able to speak directly to one another without media intrusion.

Also, this could be our chance to get rid of old labels. The Lucid and Partners were appointed themselves. This is our chance to emulate them out Boundaries purzédurs and soft. Over time we have gone from separatist separatists because we named ourselves. Similarly, we define finally what we really are. Otherwise, we continue to let the media care to baptize us and so we define.

remains to know the reaction of Marois. Does it push out the recalcitrant or she will lend a sympathetic ear?

Mathieu

Church Letter Of Condolence

Pauline Marois


Pauline and the wicked purzédurs

The Dissident agrees to Pauline Marois. It sounds paradoxical.

Why I welcome his arrival at the head of the Parti Quebecois? By pragmatism.

First, it has managed to unite all politicians separatists behind her, even Gilles Duceppe. In this rare show of unity is missing is the support of several patterns of movement, to come hopefully.

One might think that his opposition to a referendum timetable would cause the troubles with the wicked purzédurs. I do not think. To hold a referendum, the party must first exist as a credible face in Canada. Purédur myself, I think about it much. We must support Marois to avoid resentment that will block all the avenues offered by the purists. Marois has become the bridge between trends and we must protect it because it represents the last hope against the final collapse of our coalition. In a few weeks the dust settles, we will recall our support to Marois, we'll just say that we abandon the referendum timetable in exchange for the revision of the strategic framework. Obviously, this scenario is possible only in the context where purzédurs met previously in a new organization responsible for expressing requirements Marois.

Thus, the challenge to the referendum timetable does not necessarily mean a return to winning conditions. We, the purzédurs, can now demonstrate that we are more extremists that the media love to show off. Marois can she use the give and take to settle, family, issues that divide us instead of using the usual tactics to make political hay by attacking the purists, a method that has succeeded only widen the gap that separates us.

however, apply to purzédurs is not easy because they consist of several movements and countless individuals, not all members of the PQ. That is why the leadership of the PQ and talk them through the media, the opposite of effective communication. Management must be able to go directly to purzédurs without media intrusion. The only solution is to entrust the communication to a particular organization that would relay the requests of purzédurs.


Pauline and women the world

Secondly, Marois can associate sovereignty to the advancement of the cause of women. How? Being, the first to reach the post of head of the Quebec government but also at international level, making Quebec independence a demonstration of political strength of women. Imagine the gains for women in the history books of the future. Consider the example for all women in the world who demand equality in their own country. There is a continuity more than interesting for a party that has accomplished so much for women here.

Finally, like many, I let myself captivated by the polls. What they tell us? With Marois, the PQ can not only regain power but reject the third largest, the oldest party, and the richest and most federalist.

The PQ can again make history by wearing a heavy blow to the PLQ. If the PQ depends on its credibility to score points, the PLQ needs credibility for its funding.

Personally, I do not see a downside to Marois, I discovered during his press conference, she speaks little English. A small flaw that can easily improve.



Mathieu

Is It Possible To Be Dry On Day Of Ovulation

The Montreal Economic Institute and the future of Health


What the Economic Institute of Montreal?

In Quebec, the ADQ and the PLQ, the political right, often cite to justify their stance in favor of privatization, studies of the Montreal Economic Institute (MEI). But what the Montreal Economic Institute? Is best known for his record MEI schools published annually in the Journal News. It necessarily imagine, with such a name, an independent research institute, nonpartisan and nonprofit. The MEI is registered as a charity, it can not not make political donations and there are facts allow tax cuts to its donors. Yet

MEI occurs frequently in public to request legislative changes such as opening up the healthcare market, the single tax rate, tax reduction and the rejection of state aid to fight against poverty. In addition, each year, MEI publishes its list of schools to promote private schools.

It seeks primarily to transform the system of universal health public-private system. All his works are in the same direction : Reduce the size of government and privatize public services.

This powerful organization associated with the Fraser Institute, funded by companies, has a major influence on policy makers in Quebec. In addition, the MEI has still not registered as a lobbying group in the official register of lobbyists and Quebec refuses to make public the identity of its donors. We must ask ourselves some serious questions about this "think tank" that seems at first to serve the corporate interests that adorn its coffers and slavering over the possibility of replacing government as service provider in the highly lucrative world of medicine.

First a two-tier health, then? The fight will she completed for the MEI and its "shareholders" or will we be entitled to the battle system completely private?


The allies MEI

The Montreal Economic Institute can count on some key allies in its fight to privatize profits and socialize losses (in the words of Richard Desjardins ).

It may well first count on the media empire GESCA, who quickly relay information supporter of MEI. GESCA's La Presse, Le Soleil, La Voix de l'Est, La Tribune, Le Nouvelliste, The Right, The Daily. In addition, Gesca is the sole owner of cyberpresse.ca, one of the busiest Web sites in Quebec.

In Quebec, two groups share 9 of the 10 titles: Quebecor (Le Journal de Montreal and Le Journal de Quebec) with 44% of the total circulation of newspapers and French GESCA, a Canadian subsidiary owned publishing subsidiary of Power Corporation with 53% of the draw. To

manipulate public opinion, dark GESCA easily in misinformation and never hesitates to cite the work of the Institute on Health to sell its political solution, not that of Cuba you guessed it.

Despite that, Cuba has a health system that ranks among the best in the world. If GESCA is both to solve problems in health contemplates why she never seriously the example of Cuba? Ah yes, Cuba was excluded capitalism, we must dismiss it. What is being proposed then the interests of rich cleverly disguised as a virtue? Could it be that health an excuse, and that what really matters is to convince Quebecers that a right turn is needed?

To answer these questions, it is imperative that Power Corp. operates in the lucrative field of insurance and that entity has any interest in the disappearance of universal health care and lead the public debate this direction.

Another major boost to help the project comes from the MEI, the country's highest court, the Supreme Court of Canada itself. Indeed, in 2004, Dr. Jacques Chaoulli, a research associate at the Institute, asked Supreme Court recognized that the delay in obtaining necessary care violates the constitutional right to life, liberty and security of person. Chaoulli proposes to allow those who can afford to pay directly for services provided by private for-profit clinics and to allow private health insurance. The court agrees with him and creates a first opening leading the Charest government to allow private clinics multiply and sell specialized private insurance for knee, hip and cataract.

To put it simply, the democratic process Quebec as a whole is set aside: the opinion of some judges appointed by the Canadian prime minister takes precedence over the democratic will of the Quebec nation as expressed in the National Assembly through its elected members. In no way do we consult the people, everything is decided between a few individuals we must assume impartial. The fact that the Quebec people has never ratified the constitution on which said these so-called judges rely to impose their way of thinking does not seem to weigh very heavily in the balance. Democracy at the Canadian.

What is important is that the Montreal Economic Institute, through GESCA Power Corporation, Canada's constitution and its judges, the Action démocratique du Québec and the Quebec Liberal Party are all working together to end the Quebec model and gradually privatize health system.

Mathieu