Pauline Marois assumes leadership of the Parti Quebecois, a party whose members broke even disagree on the strategy to regain power and to the country of Quebec. It will restore confidence disappeared when many members are considering natural form or join a new party sovereignty, no longer believing in the ability of PQ to achieve its primary objective. To have already challenged the referendum timetable does not reassure. Yet it would be a mistake not to recognize here the flair of a good politician but also the opportunity presents itself. The schedule
separated clans and prevented any meaningful discussion and carrier for the future. The last congress was given birth to this compromise amid polls favorable to 50% by full commission Gomery. And so, all the political front was established in an atmosphere of complacency because of this cyclical aberration. Purists and electioneering could negotiate a compromise solution which had the merit of reducing tensions, temporarily. In the longer term, however, when they returned to the polls normal, that is to say, the slow decline of the PQ, the means to achieve independence proved an obstacle to the election of a sovereign government. The schedule referendum became an object of conflict and resentment in the movement between the different political families. Between electioneering, well aware that we must take power to set in motion the process of separation, and purists, well aware that it is useless to have the power to manage the province of Quebec.
The real danger for the PQ currently embodied in much the temptation of this management Provincial waiting for the next in the abandonment of the schedule. If the mandate was to bring Marois PQ in this direction, the final collapse would inevitably follow.
Many are dissatisfied with the PQ look and do not find or more. In general, they can be divided into three groups. The first advocates the application of acts of sovereignty from the election of a PQ government. The second also wants significant gestures from the beginning of the mandate, and the drafting of a constitution of countries later submitted to the people by referendum (the strategic framework developed by Robert Laplante). The latter opted instead for the referendum election where the election of the PQ is enough to declare Quebec a sovereign country.
Despite their differences, they find themselves united in their desire for a PQ does not sink into the wait.
you can easily guess the result, I suggest these actors coalesce around a kind of "union" that would counterbalance this wait, in addition to channel the energy of activists disappointed in the reform rather than the PQ its destruction. It would be a collective defeat the strategy of good government, a coalition of individuals and associations against the possible drift of winning conditions. The priority of this association is to make proposals that can rally the various trends "purzédurs" to convey to the leadership of the PQ.
Together, we have a better understanding of obstacles to overcome and the game plan to apply and a greater political weight.
Many see it as a radical project. But remember that it can avoid the creation of a new separatist party and convince those who have already dropped out of PQ, or are about, to invest a little time in a beautiful kind of risk, given one last chance to show that the PQ can still achieve sovereignty. This is one more option before leaving the PQ, found a third party and completely undermine the cohesion of the movement for emancipation of Quebecers.
Moreover, an organization that would relay the claims of the purists would solve an old problem of the PQ and allow a climate generally more courteous. Why? The purzédurs consist of several groups and countless individuals, not all members of the PQ, consequently turn to them is not an easy task. That is why the management and they talk through the media, the opposite of effective communication because it involves an actor-witness, the ordinary citizen. This greatly hampers the debate of ideas in the pollutant of unnecessary resentment. The direction and the activists should be able to speak directly to one another without media intrusion.
Also, this could be our chance to get rid of old labels. The Lucid and Partners were appointed themselves. This is our chance to emulate them out Boundaries purzédurs and soft. Over time we have gone from separatist separatists because we named ourselves. Similarly, we define finally what we really are. Otherwise, we continue to let the media care to baptize us and so we define.
remains to know the reaction of Marois. Does it push out the recalcitrant or she will lend a sympathetic ear?
Mathieu
0 comments:
Post a Comment