Invoice Federal 
This federal campaign takes a turn for ridicule. The determination of the Conservatives to present the cultural workers, and the Bloc Quebecois as wasteful spending instead of a profitable investment for society, demonstrates the weakness of their arguments. Which is expensive to taxpayers, are not our members or artists who entertain us and support many causes including homelessness and aid for countries in difficulties.
Consider the monarchy. We just get the money into our pockets to allow vice-queens and Lieutenant Governors of traveling the world and living the high life at our expense. It disgusts me. I'd rather they squeal on welfare, it costs me less. That or the prison, I am not difficult. It could also imitate the French ...
And the senate? This outmoded institution which serves to reward friends of the Prime Minister with a fairly well paid job thank you, until the age of retirement. You should have seen the office of Senator Michael Fortier, Mike to his friends, Infoman the issue. Fireplace, conference table, dining table, chairs and sofas, all in a room and huge gorgeous. For a senator. There are one hundred and five!
Do not forget the budgets for the operation of the Supreme Court, whose role is to enforce the Canadian Constitution. Small 
historical reminder: 1982, Pierre Elliot Trudeau and the premiers repatriate the Constitution to make the Basic Law of the country without Quebec's consent. Since then, no Quebec government has agreed to ratify this constitution. Despite this rejection, we and our laws must accordance with it. If, as the judges of the Supreme Court, a law passed by our democratically provincial parliament does not respect the constitution, the government is expected to change. As demonstrated by the many impairments suffered by the French Language Charter, Bill 101 since its adoption in 1977.
Why do you think Christine St-Pierre, Minister of Culture at the provincial, refused to change the law 101 and give more teeth to the obvious setbacks of the French language (especially in Montreal) ? She knows that the Supreme Court declared these changes as unconstitutional, forcing her to do reverse. It would again highlight the relationship of domination between the judges of the Supreme Court, appointed by the Prime Minister of Canada and Quebec as a nation that speaks to the National Assembly through its elected representatives.
That's what really cost dear to Quebec workers Mr. Harper!
Monarchy, Senate and Supreme Court, these three institutions exist because of the Canadian Constitution, that even a majority government 
Ottawa can not amend. It is beyond belief to have to continue funding them indefinitely. The only option possible to get rid of this clique BS luxury homes and remain independent. Canada out of Quebec.
could be developed at length on the bill related to our relationship with Canadians with topics such as the fiscal imbalance, the culture of corruption that prevails in Ottawa, the looting of the employment insurance fund or election called for partisan reasons ...
Mathieu
Colonialism in the 21st century Once again, the political situation in Quebec borders on the ridiculous. I almost hesitate to say for fear of passing for an intolerant that incites hatred, but these days the leaders of the black community disjonctent completely.
They want to Victor-Lévy Beaulieu, who has dared to call the general information in a queen-negro The paper Aut'journal. However, attacks against VLB seem to be much worse than its text, as Liberal MP who compares a fool goes into a school equipped with a firearm. The same member who now wishes to violate freedom of expression to avoid this kind of "call violence ".
Michaëlle Jean, meanwhile, deserves strangely qu'éloges and admiration from them. Unfortunately, this way of defending that which has agreed to assume the office of vice-queen, they justify the policy choice of Mrs. Jean embody the monarchy, an institution that rhymes with English colonialism, exploitation and slavery.
I personally believe that taking a stand for the monarchical system and its defenders and claiming to restrict freedom of expression of others, the black community is currently profoundly anti-liberal discourse that has no place in Quebec. She found that VLB insensitivity towards him but we could easily return to Mrs. Jean criticism towards the people of Quebec. For the latter royalty, that represents Ms. Jean, symbolizes the repression that has endured long after the Conquest of 1760, for example, when Queen Victoria ordered the hanging and exile patriots. Therefore we do not celebrate Victoria Day, or Queen's Day here. We prefer to celebrate the ideas of republican parliamentary patriots. Quebec rejected the monarchy and the violence it he was subjected to imperialist reasons. Queen indeed never been welcome here as evidenced by the numerous demonstrations on his rare visits. Playing heir to this heritage, Ms. Jean shows a total disregard for our nation and its evolution. Far from a role model for young Haitians as the spokesperson says black, it is a specimen that they should denounce it. In accepting the role, she has insulted and turned back to the Quebec nation, of which the black community.
Also let's be clear, the trial Public VLB is also very serious because it becomes a form of verbal intimidation aimed at those who do not share the views of this group on how to use the words! That far exceeds the tax because of VLB and racist attempt to discredit him will strengthen an already unhealthy. People are reluctant to address certain sensitive issues in public for fear of appearing to be xenophobic. Yet, in a democracy are sensitive issues that need the most debate. This is vital. Therefore, avoid the pitfalls that can block trade and the deliberative process.
I would however like to hope that the Quebec people, the elite of this community misrepresents the silent majority. I wait a Haitian or a rose, not even to be an advocate for VLB, just to denounce a reaction that joins the harmful excesses. A dissenting voice in this family portrait what.
Mathieu
Review the strategic framework, take 2 The recent founding of a new nationalist group, the Independence Party marks a further step in the slow and painful splitting sovereignty movement since the failed referendum initiated 1995.
Indeed, hardly meeting within the Parti Quebecois in the dissolution of the NIR in 1968, advocates a Quebec country is now split between moderates and radicals. The soft against the purzédurs. The electoral versus purist.
So, now we end up with two parties separatists, competing and very different views on method of independence.
the PQ is desired to wait until the winning conditions for a referendum, while for the PI, just take power and declare independence.
In this context, the proposal contained in "Reviewing the strategic framework is offered a second life. Originally prepared by Robert Laplante ideas for Season, published in the journal National Action, it becomes an opportunity for reconciliation.
More moderate than the position of PI, more engaging than the process of PQ, it represents an action plan attached which can potentially bring the two formations.
What is this new program? Roughly, a PQ government would gestures of disruptions with the canadian government was preparing a draft constitution Country and submit it to the people by referendum. If it is earned, Quebec becomes independent, ipso facto.
Based on this strategy, representatives of the PQ and PI can initiate discussions and negotiate an agreement to unite again the pro-independence activists and avoid division of votes in provincial elections. Moreover, different organizations such as Le Quebecois separatists should not hesitate to push this and put pressure on our representatives. The success of our business depends.
Mathieu
This federal campaign takes a turn for ridicule. The determination of the Conservatives to present the cultural workers, and the Bloc Quebecois as wasteful spending instead of a profitable investment for society, demonstrates the weakness of their arguments. Which is expensive to taxpayers, are not our members or artists who entertain us and support many causes including homelessness and aid for countries in difficulties. 
historical reminder: 1982, Pierre Elliot Trudeau and the premiers repatriate the Constitution to make the Basic Law of the country without Quebec's consent. Since then, no Quebec government has agreed to ratify this constitution. Despite this rejection, we and our laws must accordance with it. If, as the judges of the Supreme Court, a law passed by our democratically provincial parliament does not respect the constitution, the government is expected to change. As demonstrated by the many impairments suffered by the French Language Charter, Bill 101 since its adoption in 1977. 
Why do you think Christine St-Pierre, Minister of Culture at the provincial, refused to change the law 101 and give more teeth to the obvious setbacks of the French language (especially in Montreal) ? She knows that the Supreme Court declared these changes as unconstitutional, forcing her to do reverse. It would again highlight the relationship of domination between the judges of the Supreme Court, appointed by the Prime Minister of Canada and Quebec as a nation that speaks to the National Assembly through its elected representatives. 
Ottawa can not amend. It is beyond belief to have to continue funding them indefinitely. The only option possible to get rid of this clique BS luxury homes and remain independent. Canada out of Quebec. 
